Abstract

Abstract We first review the main points in the dispute about whether emotion is primary and independent of cognition (Zajonc), or secondary and always dependent upon cognition (Lazarus), and suggest that the dispute is largely one of definition. Because definitional disputes seldom clarify substantive, theoretical points, we suggest a variety of questions regarding cognition-emotion interaction. To stimulate discussion of these issues, we propose a componential model in which emotions are seen to develop from simpler, reflex-like forms ("wired-in" sensory-motor processes) to complex cognitive-emotional patterns that result from the participation of at least two distinct levels of memory and information processing, a schematic and a conceptual level. These systems are typically activated by a continuous stimulus check process which evaluates five environment-organism attributes: novelty; pleasantness; goal conductiveness; coping potential; and consistency with social norms and self-relevant values. Questions about the relationship of cognition to emotion, and how two initially independent systems become inseparably interrelated, are transformed when viewed within the context of the dynamic, multilevel emotion processing system.

Keywords

PsychologyCognitionCognitive psychologyNoveltySocial cognitionStimulus (psychology)Cognitive appraisalCognitive scienceSocial psychology

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

The origins and ends of giftedness.

Five issues about giftedness are discussed. First, the origins of giftedness are explored. The view that giftedness is entirely a product of training is critiqued. There is indi...

2000 American Psychologist 234 citations

Publication Info

Year
1987
Type
article
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
3-28
Citations
809
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

809
OpenAlex
33
Influential
498
CrossRef

Cite This

Howard Leventhal, Klaus R. Scherer (1987). The Relationship of Emotion to Cognition: A Functional Approach to a Semantic Controversy. Cognition & Emotion , 1 (1) , 3-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699938708408361

Identifiers

DOI
10.1080/02699938708408361

Data Quality

Data completeness: 77%