Abstract

Many elements of qualitative research are shared between the variety of approaches, and often the overlap of epistemology, ethics and procedures encourages a generic and flexible view of this type of inquiry. This article argues that there is an essential tension between flexibility on the one hand, and consistency and coherence on the other. Such tension may encourage qualitative researchers to consider the intentions and philosophical underpinnings of the different approaches in greater depth in order to arrive at an epistemological position that can coherently underpin its empirical claims. This article is intended to encourage a more thoughtful engagement with different qualitative approaches by highlighting distinctive elements of three of the most common approaches. We suggest that the researcher be contextsensitive and flexible as well as considerate of the inner consistency and coherence that is needed when engaged in qualitative research.

Keywords

Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy)Consistency (knowledge bases)EpistemologyFlexibility (engineering)Qualitative researchVariety (cybernetics)SociologyPsychologyComputer scienceSocial psychologyEngineering ethicsSocial scienceArtificial intelligenceMathematicsEngineeringPhilosophy

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Quality in Qualitative Research

A variety of conceptions of qualitative research exist, with competing claims as to what counts as good quality work. Rather than opting for the criteria promoted by one variety...

1999 Qualitative Inquiry 1725 citations

Publication Info

Year
2003
Type
article
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
345-357
Citations
945
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

945
OpenAlex

Cite This

Immy Holloway, Les Todres (2003). The Status of Method: Flexibility, Consistency and Coherence. Qualitative Research , 3 (3) , 345-357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794103033004

Identifiers

DOI
10.1177/1468794103033004