Abstract

Abstract So far as I know, no economist has as yet attempted a general theory of the growth of firms. This seems to me so very strange that I am sure anyone attempting it should indeed watch his (or her) step, for naturally there is always a good reason for what economists do or do not do. Perhaps such a theory is impossible to construct, unnecessary, trivial, or outside the pale of economics proper. I do not know, but I offer this study in the hope that all four possibilities will be rejected.

Keywords

Diversification (marketing strategy)Dominance (genetics)EconomicsGrowth theoryPosition (finance)Market economyIndustrial organizationEconomic systemEconomic geographyMonetary economicsBusinessNeoclassical economicsFinance

Related Publications

The Capital Structure Puzzle

Stewart C. Myers President of American Finance Association 1983 This paper's title is intended to remind you of Fischer Black's well-known note on “The Dividend Puzzle,” which h...

1984 The Journal of Finance 7515 citations

The Theory of the Firm Revisited

Abstract From the birth of modern economics in 1776 to 1970, a span of almost 200 years, only two works seem to have been written about the theory of the firm that have altered ...

1991 195 citations

Publication Info

Year
1997
Type
book
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
27-39
Citations
13321
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

13321
OpenAlex

Cite This

Edith Penrose (1997). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Long Range Planning , 29 (4) , 27-39. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198781806.003.0003

Identifiers

DOI
10.1093/oso/9780198781806.003.0003