Abstract

A social theory of gender is implied and required by current sexual politics. Its scope cannot be defined a priori, but can be defined practically by the reach of a network of arguments generated by feminism, gay liberation, psychoanalysis and some branches of academic sociology and psychology. Two main types of theory have emerged: one emphasising attitudes and social expectations, centring on the idea of `sex roles'; the other presupposing the categories of `women' and `men' and focussing on power relations between them. Criticisms of both general approaches to gender relations are outlined. An argument is advanced for a modification of the second, centring on the practices that constitute gender categories. Some examples of this third approach are mentioned. The problem of `natural difference' can be handled in a practice-based theory of gender by a radical reversal of usual assumptions about biological `bases' of gender, stressing negation and practical transcendence. Some political implications of this approach to theory are raised.

Keywords

NegationSociologyEpistemologyFeminismPower (physics)Argument (complex analysis)PoliticsTranscendence (philosophy)Social theoryNatural (archaeology)Gender studiesSocial sciencePhilosophy

Related Publications

Managerial Dilemmas

In organisation theory a schism has developed between the traditional organisational behaviour literature, based in psychology, sociology and political science, and the more ana...

1992 Cambridge University Press eBooks 842 citations

The Wretched of the Earth

A distinguished psychiatrist from Martinique who took part in the Algerian Nationalist Movement, Frantz Fanon was one of the most important theorists of revolutionary struggle, ...

2018 7413 citations

Publication Info

Year
1985
Type
article
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
260-272
Citations
183
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric
PlumX Metrics

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

183
OpenAlex

Cite This

Raewyn Connell (1985). Theorising Gender. Sociology , 19 (2) , 260-272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038585019002008

Identifiers

DOI
10.1177/0038038585019002008