Abstract

The three pillar conception of (social, economic and environmental) sustainability, commonly represented by three intersecting circles with overall sustainability at the centre, has become ubiquitous. With a view to identifying the genesis and theoretical foundations of this conception, this paper reviews and discusses relevant historical sustainability literature. From this we find that there is no single point of origin of this three pillar conception, but rather a gradual emergence from various critiques in the early academic literature of the economic status quo from both social and ecological perspectives on the one hand, and the quest to reconcile economic growth as a solution to social and ecological problems on the part of the United Nations on the other. The popular three circles diagram appears to have been first presented by Barbier (1987), albeit purposed towards developing nations with foci which differ from modern interpretations. The conceptualisation of three pillars seems to predate this however. Nowhere have we found a theoretically rigorous description of the three pillars. This is thought to be in part due to the nature of the sustainability discourse arising from broadly different schools of thought historically. The absence of such a theoretically solid conception frustrates approaches towards a theoretically rigorous operationalisation of ‘sustainability’.

Keywords

Landscape ecologySustainabilitySustainable developmentSustainability scienceEnvironmental planningEnvironmental resource managementGeographyEcologyBiologyEnvironmental scienceSocial sustainability

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2018
Type
article
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
681-695
Citations
2792
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

2792
OpenAlex

Cite This

Ben Purvis, Yong Mao, Darren Robinson (2018). Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. Sustainability Science , 14 (3) , 681-695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5

Identifiers

DOI
10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5