Abstract

Abstract We examine the controversial practice of using parcels of items as manifest variables in structural equation modeling (SEM) procedures. After detailing arguments pro and con, we conclude that the unconsidered use of parcels is never warranted, while, at the same time, the considered use of parcels cannot be dismissed out of hand. In large part, the decision to parcel or not depends on one's philosophical stance regarding scientific inquiry (e.g., empiricist vs. pragmatist) and the substantive goal of a study (e.g., to understand the structure of a set of items or to examine the nature of a set of constructs). Prior to creating parcels, however, we recommend strongly that investigators acquire a thorough understanding of the nature and dimensionality of the items to be parceled. With this knowledge in hand, various techniques for creating parcels can be utilized to minimize potential pitfalls and to optimize the measurement structure of constructs in SEM procedures. A number of parceling techniques are described, noting their strengths and weaknesses.

Keywords

Set (abstract data type)PragmatismEpistemologyStrengths and weaknessesEmpiricismPsychologyComputer scienceManagement scienceData scienceSociologySocial psychologyEconomicsPhilosophy

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2002
Type
article
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
151-173
Citations
6106
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

6106
OpenAlex

Cite This

Todd D. Little, William A. Cunningham, Golan Shahar et al. (2002). To Parcel or Not to Parcel: Exploring the Question, Weighing the Merits. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal , 9 (2) , 151-173. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem0902_1

Identifiers

DOI
10.1207/s15328007sem0902_1