Abstract

In this study, the authors examined the findings and implications of the research on trust in leadership that has been conducted during the past 4 decades. First, the study provides estimates of the primary relationships between trust in leadership and key outcomes, antecedents, and correlates (k = 106). Second, the study explores how specifying the construct with alternative leadership referents (direct leaders vs. organizational leadership) and definitions (types of trust) results in systematically different relationships between trust in leadership and outcomes and antecedents. Direct leaders (e.g., supervisors) appear to be a particularly important referent of trust. Last, a theoretical framework is offered to provide parsimony to the expansive literature and to clarify the different perspectives on the construct of trust in leadership and its operation.

Keywords

PsychologyConstruct (python library)ExpansiveReferentShared leadershipLeadership studiesLeadershipSocial psychologyServant leadershipTransactional leadershipLeadership style

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Transformational Leadership

Purpose – This paper aims to review the latest management developments across the globe and pinpoint practical implications from cutting-edge research and case studies. Design/m...

2019 Engage!: Co-creating Organizational V... 1699 citations

Publication Info

Year
2002
Type
review
Volume
87
Issue
4
Pages
611-628
Citations
3141
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

3141
OpenAlex

Cite This

Kurt T. Dirks, Donald L. Ferrin (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice.. Journal of Applied Psychology , 87 (4) , 611-628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611

Identifiers

DOI
10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611