Abstract

The findings validate earlier results showing no advantage from radical mastectomy. Although differences of a few percentage points cannot be excluded, the findings fail to show a significant survival advantage from removing occult positive nodes at the time of initial surgery or from radiation therapy.

Keywords

MedicineMastectomyRadical mastectomyRandomized controlled trialRadiation therapyTotal MastectomyBreast cancerSurgeryModified Radical MastectomyGeneral surgeryCancerInternal medicine

MeSH Terms

Breast NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceLymphatic MetastasisMastectomyRadicalMastectomySimpleNeoplasm RecurrenceLocalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurvival Analysis

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2002
Type
article
Volume
347
Issue
8
Pages
567-575
Citations
1361
Access
Closed

Citation Metrics

1361
OpenAlex
35
Influential
1148
CrossRef

Cite This

Bernard Fisher, Jong‐Hyeon Jeong, Stewart Anderson et al. (2002). Twenty-Five-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Trial Comparing Radical Mastectomy, Total Mastectomy, and Total Mastectomy Followed by Irradiation. New England Journal of Medicine , 347 (8) , 567-575. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa020128

Identifiers

DOI
10.1056/nejmoa020128
PMID
12192016

Data Quality

Data completeness: 86%