Abstract
Qualitative researchers rely — implicitly or explicitly — on a variety of understandings and corresponding types of validity in the process of describing, interpreting,and explaining phenomena of interest. In this article, Joseph Maxwell makes explicit this process by defining five types of understanding and validity commonly used in qualitative research. After discussing the nature of validity in qualitative research,the author details the philosophical and practical dimensions of: descriptive validity,interpretive validity, theoretical validity, generalizability, and evaluative validity. In each case, he addresses corresponding issues of understanding. In conclusion,Maxwell discusses the implications of the proposed typology as a useful checklist of the kinds of threats to validity that one needs to consider and as a framework for thinking about the nature of these threats and the possible ways that specific threats might be addressed.
Keywords
TypologyGeneralizability theoryExternal validityPsychologyQualitative researchValidityVariety (cybernetics)EpistemologyTest validityProcess (computing)ChecklistSocial psychologyCognitive psychologyPsychometricsComputer scienceSociologySocial scienceArtificial intelligenceDevelopmental psychology
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach
Are you thinking about doing a qualitative study, or currently in the middle of one? If so, Joseph A. Maxwell's Qualitative Research Design is the reliable guide for you. Taking...
Qualitative methodologies II: a brief guide to applying interpretative phenomenological analysis in musculoskeletal care
Abstract In this paper, we conclude our two‐part series discussing how readers of Musculoskeletal Care might employ qualitative methods. In the first paper of the series, we foc...
Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework
Aim. This paper discusses the literature on establishing rigour in research studies. It describes the methodological trinity of reliability, validity and generalization and expl...
The Essential Guide to Doing Your Research Project
PART ONE: TAKING THE LEAP INTO THE RESEARCH WORLD The challenge of tackling a research project So what is this thing called research and why do it? The need for research knowled...
Description versus Interpretation: Competing Alternative Strategies for Qualitative Research
Abstract In the contemporary scene, psychological researchers seeking alternative (qualitative) research strategies are turning increasingly toward interpretation theory. Howeve...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1992
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 279-301
- Citations
- 2848
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
2848
OpenAlex
Cite This
Joseph A. Maxwell
(1992).
Understanding and Validity in Qualitative Research.
Harvard Educational Review
, 62
(3)
, 279-301.
https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.62.3.8323320856251826
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.17763/haer.62.3.8323320856251826