Abstract

No one can question the remarkable contribution of US public health to understanding the causes and consequences of illness, disability, and death. However, some commentators question the agenda: the endless pursuit of individual risk factors and the cursory attention to social determinants of disease. We attempt to illustrate some limitations of US public health by focusing on type-2 diabetes (adult-onset non-insulin-dependent diabetes)--an increasingly prevalent but still poorly understood medical condition with devastating complications and implications for quality of life. A more theoretically based multilevel approach to diabetes, outlined for the 21st century, has an almost exclusive downstream curative focus, that ranges from midstream preventive programmes to upstream healthy public policy.

Keywords

MidstreamPublic healthUpstream (networking)DiseaseMedicineDiabetes mellitusDownstream (manufacturing)Social determinants of healthQuality of life (healthcare)GerontologyPolitical scienceDevelopment economicsIntensive care medicineBusinessEconomicsPathologyNursing

MeSH Terms

Blood GlucoseDiabetes MellitusType 2HumansPublic HealthQuality of LifeRisk FactorsUnited States

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2000
Type
review
Volume
356
Issue
9231
Pages
757-761
Citations
204
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

204
OpenAlex
4
Influential
144
CrossRef

Cite This

John B. McKinlay, Lisa Marceau (2000). US public health and the 21st century: diabetes mellitus. The Lancet , 356 (9231) , 757-761. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02641-6

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02641-6
PMID
11085708

Data Quality

Data completeness: 81%