Abstract
THE ULTIMATE PURPOSE of applied health research is to improve health care. Summarizing the literature to adduce recommendations for clinical practice is an important part of the process. Recently, the health sciences community has reduced the bias and imprecision of traditional literature summaries and their associated recommendations through the development of rigorous criteria for both literature overviews<sup>1-3</sup>and practice guidelines.<sup>4,5</sup>Even when recommendations come from such rigorous approaches, however, it is important to differentiate between those based on weak vs strong evidence. Recommendations based on inadequate evidence often require reversal when sufficient data become available,<sup>6</sup>while timely implementation of recommendations based on strong evidence can save lives.<sup>6</sup>In this article, we suggest an approach to classifying strength of recommendations. We direct our discussion primarily at clinicians who make treatment recommendations that they hope their colleagues will follow. However, we believe that any clinician who attends to
Keywords
MedicineMEDLINEHealth careProcess (computing)Clinical PracticeMedical literatureEvidence-based medicineAlternative medicineMedical educationFamily medicineComputer sciencePathology
Related Publications
Differential diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis: a consensus approach
Background and objectives Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) requires exclusion of diseases that could better explain the clinical and paraclinical findings. A systematic proc...
Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU
Objective: To update and expand the 2013 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pain, Agitation, and Delirium in Adult Patients in the ICU. Design: Thirty-two intern...
2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines
Since 1980, the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA) have translated scientific evidence into clinical practice guidelines with recommendati...
Scope, quality, and inclusivity of clinical guidelines produced early in the covid-19 pandemic: rapid review
Abstract Objective To appraise the availability, quality, and inclusivity of clinical guidelines produced in the early stage of the coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) pandemic....
Translational Science and Evidence-Based Healthcare: A Clarification and Reconceptualization of How Knowledge Is Generated and Used in Healthcare
The importance of basing health policy and health care practices on the best available international evidence (“evidence-based health care”) and on translating knowledge or evid...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1995
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 274
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 1800-1800
- Citations
- 836
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
836
OpenAlex
Cite This
Gordon Guyatt
(1995).
Users' Guides to the Medical Literature.
JAMA
, 274
(22)
, 1800-1800.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03530220066035
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1001/jama.1995.03530220066035