Abstract
Medical practice is constantly changing. The rate of change is accelerating, and physicians can be forgiven if they often find it dizzying. How can physicians learn about new information and innovations, and decide how (if at all) they should modify their practice? Possible sources include summaries from the medical literature (review articles, practice guidelines, consensus statements, editorials, and summary articles in "throwaway" journals); consultation with colleagues who have special expertise; lectures; seminars; advertisements in medical journals; conversations with representatives from pharmaceutical companies; and original articles in journals and journal supplements. Each of these sources of information might be valuable, though each is subject to its own particular biases.<sup>1,2</sup>Problems arise when, as is often the case, these sources of information provide different suggestions about patient care. See also p 2093. Without a way of critically appraising the information they receive, clinicians are relatively helpless in deciding what new information
Keywords
Subject (documents)MedicineMedical literatureMedical practiceMEDLINEMedical informationClinical PracticePatient careMedical educationPublic relationsFamily medicineNursingComputer scienceWorld Wide WebLaw
Related Publications
“It Depends”
Despite recognizing and articulating basic guiding principles of professionalism, physicians' approaches to professional challenges were subject to multiple, interdependent, idi...
More Informative Abstracts Revisited
Following proposals in 1987 and 1988, several medical journals have provided more informative abstracts ("structured abstracts") for articles of clinical interest. Structured ab...
Sustainability of collaborative care interventions in primary care settings
• Summary: We assessed patient and provider barriers and facilitators to sustainability of a collaborative depression care model for depression treatment in predominantly Hispan...
A Tool for Reviewers
Peer review lies at the core of science and academic life. In one of its most pervasive forms, peer review for the scientific literature is the main mechanism that research jour...
Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy
Preface Preface to the 2nd Edition 1. Human Science Introduction Why Do Human Science Research? What Is a Hermeneutic Phenomenological Human Science? What Does it Mean to Be Rat...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1993
- Type
- editorial
- Volume
- 270
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 2096-2097
- Citations
- 2981
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
2981
OpenAlex
Cite This
Gordon Guyatt
(1993).
Users' guides to the medical literature.
JAMA
, 270
(17)
, 2096-2097.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.270.17.2096
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1001/jama.270.17.2096