Abstract

Damasio’s somatic-marker hypothesis claims that people rely on somatic markers—physiological responses to situations of gain or loss—to make value-relevant decisions, not simply on cool reason. To test this hypothesis, undergraduates were presented with false physiological feedback as they listened to audiotapes describing situations threatening two values, freedom and equality. They were then asked to make decisions that implicated these values. Decisions favored whichever value had received stronger feedback while listening to the value-threatening situations. Feedback did not, however, affect judgments about the relative importance of the values in general; these judgments were apparently based on cognitive retrieval from memory of a stored value hierarchy, which also—and independently— affected the value-related decisions. These results supported the somatic-marker hypothesis.

Keywords

PsychologyValue (mathematics)Social psychologyAffect (linguistics)Cognitive psychologyTest (biology)CognitionActive listeningStatisticsCommunication

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1999
Type
article
Volume
25
Issue
8
Pages
1021-1032
Citations
30
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

30
OpenAlex
0
Influential
14
CrossRef

Cite This

C. Daniel Batson, Connie Engel, Scott R. Fridell (1999). Value Judgments: Testing the Somatic-Marker Hypothesis Using False Physiological Feedback. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 25 (8) , 1021-1032. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672992511009

Identifiers

DOI
10.1177/01461672992511009

Data Quality

Data completeness: 77%