Abstract

Memory complaints and intact IADL may be unnecessary requirements for a case definition of MCI in population-based samples. The MCI criteria identify people at increased risk of AD, but the potential for improvement of a substantial proportion of those with MCI needs to be acknowledged.

Keywords

DementiaActivities of daily livingAffect (linguistics)GerontologyMedicineNeuropsychologyPopulationCohortInstitutionalisationMemory impairmentCohort studyCognitionAlzheimer's diseaseDiseaseCognitive impairmentPsychologyPsychiatryInternal medicineEnvironmental health

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Mild Cognitive Impairment

Abstract What are the boundary zones between normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease (AD)? Are many elderly people whom we regard as normal actually in the early stages of AD? Alzh...

2003 197 citations

Publication Info

Year
2003
Type
article
Volume
61
Issue
9
Pages
1179-1184
Citations
261
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

261
OpenAlex

Cite This

John D. Fisk, Heather Merry, Kenneth Rockwood (2003). Variations in case definition affect prevalence but not outcomes of mild cognitive impairment. Neurology , 61 (9) , 1179-1184. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000089238.07771.c7

Identifiers

DOI
10.1212/01.wnl.0000089238.07771.c7