Abstract

More than forty years have passed since Coase's fundamental insight that transaction, coordination, and contracting costs must be considered explicitly in explaining the extent of vertical integration. Starting from the truism that profit-maximizing firms will undertake those activities that they find cheaper to administer internally than to purchase in the market, Coase forced economists to begin looking for previously neglected constraints on the trading process that might efficiently lead to an intrafirm rather than an interfirm transaction. This paper attempts to add to this literature by exploring one particular cost of using the market system – the possibility of postcontractual opportunistic behavior.

Keywords

Coase theoremEconomic rentVertical integrationTransaction costProfit (economics)Industrial organizationEconomicsDatabase transactionMicroeconomicsProcess (computing)BusinessCommerceComputer science

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

The Theory of the Firm Revisited

Abstract From the birth of modern economics in 1776 to 1970, a span of almost 200 years, only two works seem to have been written about the theory of the firm that have altered ...

1991 195 citations

Alliance Capitalism

Business practices in Japan inspire fierce and even acrimonious debate, especially when they are compared to American practices. This book attempts to explain the remarkable eco...

1992 923 citations

Publication Info

Year
2009
Type
book-chapter
Pages
96-115
Citations
683
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

683
OpenAlex

Cite This

Benjamin Klein, Robert Crawford, Armen A. Alchian (2009). Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. Cambridge University Press eBooks , 96-115. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511817410.010

Identifiers

DOI
10.1017/cbo9780511817410.010