Abstract

What makes us modern? This is a classic question in philosophy as well as in political science. However it is often raised without including science and technology in its definition. The argument of this book is that we are modern as long as we split our political process in two - between politics proper, and science and technology. This division allows the formidable expansion of the Western empires. However it has become more and more difficult to maintain this distance between science and politics. Hence the postmodern predicament - the feeling that the modern stance is no longer acceptable but that there is no alternative. The solution, advances one of France's leading sociologists of science, is to realize that we have never been modern to begin with. The comparative anthropology this text provides reintroduces science to the fabric of daily life and aims to make us compatible both with our past and with other cultures wrongly called pre-modern.

Keywords

History

Related Publications

Offices are open systems

This paper is intended as a contribution to analysis of the implications of viewing offices as open systems. It takes a prescriptive stance on how to establish the information-p...

1986 ACM Transactions on Information Systems 343 citations

Publication Info

Year
1994
Type
article
Volume
31
Issue
09
Pages
31-4888
Citations
9333
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

9333
OpenAlex

Cite This

Bruno Latour (1994). We have never been modern. Choice Reviews Online , 31 (09) , 31-4888. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.31-4888

Identifiers

DOI
10.5860/choice.31-4888