Abstract

The objective of this paper was to determine the views of accident and emergency consultants and trainees towards practice guidelines and their experiences using guidelines. A postal questionnaire survey of consultants, senior registrars and registrars in accident and emergency medicine was carried out in Yorkshire. The results of this survey show that the potential benefits of practice guidelines are appreciated, and that evidence-based and 'user-friendly' guidelines are wanted. It is concluded that unless rigorously developed and clear and easy to use, guidelines are unlikely to be implemented in accident and emergency departments in the UK.

Keywords

Medical emergencyMedicineAccident (philosophy)Emergency medical servicesAccident and emergencyMEDLINEPolitical scienceLaw

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Guidelines and cardiac anaesthetists

Guidelines for cardiac anaesthesia could reduce irrational variation in practice and so improve cardiac surgical outcome. In October 1994, a postal survey was undertaken to dete...

1997 Anaesthesia 11 citations

Publication Info

Year
1997
Type
article
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
68-71
Citations
13
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

13
OpenAlex

Cite This

R D Hardern, Susan Hampshaw (1997). What do accident and emergency medical staff think of practice guidelines?. European Journal of Emergency Medicine , 4 (2) , 68-71. https://doi.org/10.1097/00063110-199706000-00003

Identifiers

DOI
10.1097/00063110-199706000-00003