Abstract
Qualitative research has an enormous amount to contribute to the fields of health, medicine and public health but readers and reviewers from these fields have little understanding of how to judge its quality. Work to date accurately reflects the complexity of the theoretical debate required but may not meet the needs of practitioners attempting to apply qualitative work in reviews of evidence. This article describes a simple, practitioner-focused framework for assessing the rigour of qualitative research that attempts to be inclusive of a range of epistemological and ontological standpoints. An extensive review of the literature, contributions from expert groups and practitioners themselves lead to the generation of two core principles of quality: transparency and systematicity, elaborated to summarize the range of techniques commonly used, mirroring the flow of the research process. The complexities discovered are only summarized here. Finally, outstanding issues such as ‘how much transparency is enough?’, are flagged up.
Keywords
RigourTransparency (behavior)MirroringQualitative researchEngineering ethicsManagement scienceQuality (philosophy)Public healthEpistemologySociologyData sciencePsychologyComputer scienceMedicineSocial scienceSocial psychologyEngineeringNursing
Related Publications
The Development of Constructivist Grounded Theory
Constructivist grounded theory is a popular method for research studies primarily in the disciplines of psychology, education, and nursing. In this article, the authors aim to l...
Toward an Agenda for Evaluation of Qualitative Research
Evaluation is essential for research quality and development, but the diversity of traditions that characterize qualitative research suggests that general checklists or shared c...
Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research
This is the first in a series of three articles In the past decade, qualitative methods have become more commonplace in areas such as health services research and health techn...
Qualitative synthesis and systematic review in health professions education
Context Formal qualitative synthesis is the process of pooling qualitative and mixed‐method research data, and then drawing conclusions regarding the collective meaning of the r...
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research
Abstract Reproducible science requires transparent reporting. The ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) were originally developed in 2010 to impr...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2006
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 799-808
- Citations
- 389
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
389
OpenAlex
Cite This
Jane Meyrick
(2006).
What is Good Qualitative Research?.
Journal of Health Psychology
, 11
(5)
, 799-808.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105306066643
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1177/1359105306066643