Abstract

The intention to treat approach is often inadequately described and inadequately applied. Authors should explicitly describe the handling of deviations from randomised allocation and missing responses and discuss the potential effect of any missing response. Readers should critically assess the validity of reported intention to treat analyses.

Keywords

Missing dataOutcome (game theory)MedicineRandomized controlled trialIntervention (counseling)Clinical trialFamily medicineStatisticsSurgeryPsychiatryMathematics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Empirical Evidence of Bias

<h3>Objective.</h3> —To determine if inadequate approaches to randomized controlled trial design and execution are associated with evidence of bias in estimating treatment effec...

1995 JAMA 5475 citations

Publication Info

Year
1999
Type
review
Volume
319
Issue
7211
Pages
670-674
Citations
2124
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

2124
OpenAlex

Cite This

S. Hollis, Fiona Campbell (1999). What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ , 319 (7211) , 670-674. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7211.670

Identifiers

DOI
10.1136/bmj.319.7211.670