Abstract
Good computer and video games like System Shock 2, Deus Ex, Pikmin, Rise of Nations, Neverwinter Nights, and Xenosaga: Episode 1 are learning machines. They get themselves learned and learned well, so that they get played long and hard by a great many people. This is how they and their designers survive and perpetuate themselves. If a game cannot be learned and even mastered at a certain level, it won't get played by enough people, and the company that makes it will go broke. Good learning in games is a capitalist-driven Darwinian process of selection of the fittest. Of course, game designers could have solved their learning problems by making games shorter and easier, by dumbing them down, so to speak. But most gamers don't want short and easy games. Thus, designers face and largely solve an intriguing educational dilemma, one also faced by schools and workplaces: how to get people, often young people, to learn and master something that is long and challenging--and enjoy it, to boot.
Keywords
LiteracyMathematics educationPedagogyPsychologyMultimediaSociologyComputer science
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.
WHY A TASK FORCE ON THE FAMILY? The practice of pediatrics is unique among medical specialties in many ways, among which is the nearly certain presence of a parent when health c...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2004
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4
- Citations
- 6693
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
6693
OpenAlex
Cite This
James Paul Gee
(2004).
What Video Games Have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy.
Education + Training
, 46
(4)
.
https://doi.org/10.1108/et.2004.00446dae.002
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1108/et.2004.00446dae.002