Abstract
Narrative literature reviews serve a vital scientific function, but few resources help people learn to write them. As compared with empirical reports, literature reviews can tackle broader and more abstract questions, can engage in more post hoc theorizing without the danger of capitalizing on chance, can make a stronger case for a null-hypothesis conclusion, and can appreciate and use methodological diversity better. Also, literature reviews can draw any of 4 conclusions: The hypothesis is correct, it has not been conclusively established but is the currently best guess, it is false, or the evidence permits no conclusion. Common mistakes of authors of literature review manuscripts are described.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Narration as a human communication paradigm: The case of public moral argument
This essay proposes a theory of human communication based on a conception of persons as homo narrans. It compares and contrasts this view with the traditional rational perspecti...
Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches
Chapter 1. Anthropology and the Social Sciences Chapter 2. The Foundations of Social Research Chapter 3. Preparing for Research Chapter 4. Research Design: Experiments and Exper...
Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques
There has been an accumulation of qualitative studies in recent years, but little cumulation of the understandings gained from them. Qualitative research appears endangered both...
Соціальне партнерство у структурі моделі професійної підготовки соціального педагога
Про соціальне партнерство у структурі моделі професійної підготовки соціального педагога.
Publication Info
- Year
- 1997
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 311-320
- Citations
- 1031
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311