Abstract

Narrative literature reviews serve a vital scientific function, but few resources help people learn to write them. As compared with empirical reports, literature reviews can tackle broader and more abstract questions, can engage in more post hoc theorizing without the danger of capitalizing on chance, can make a stronger case for a null-hypothesis conclusion, and can appreciate and use methodological diversity better. Also, literature reviews can draw any of 4 conclusions: The hypothesis is correct, it has not been conclusively established but is the currently best guess, it is false, or the evidence permits no conclusion. Common mistakes of authors of literature review manuscripts are described.

Keywords

NarrativeDiversity (politics)Function (biology)PsychologyEpistemologyNarrative reviewScientific literatureSociologyLinguisticsPhilosophyPsychotherapist

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1997
Type
article
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
311-320
Citations
1031
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1031
OpenAlex

Cite This

Roy F. Baumeister, Mark R. Leary (1997). Writing Narrative Literature Reviews. Review of General Psychology , 1 (3) , 311-320. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311

Identifiers

DOI
10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311