Abstract

Much has been written about stakeholder analysis as a process by which to introduce ethical values into management decision-making. This paper takes a critical look at the assumptions behind this idea, in an effort to understand better the meaning of ethical management decisions. A distinction is made between stakeholder analysis and stakeholder synthesis. The two most natural kinds of stakeholder synthesis are then defined and discussed: strategic and multi-fiduciary. Paradoxically, the former appears to yield business without ethics and the latter appears to yield ethics without business. The paper concludes by suggesting that a third approach to stakeholder thinking needs to be developed, one that avoids the paradox just mentioned and that clarifies for managers (and directors) the legitimate role of ethical considerations in decision-making. So we must think through what management should be accountable for; and how and through whom its accountability can be discharged. The stockholders’ interest, both short- and long-term, is one of the areas. But it is only one. Peter Drucker, 1988 Harvard Business Review

Keywords

Business ethicsStakeholderStakeholder theoryFiduciaryShareholderStakeholder analysisStakeholder managementMeaning (existential)BusinessAccountabilitySociologyPolitical sciencePublic relationsEngineering ethicsManagementCorporate governanceEconomicsEpistemologyLawEngineeringPhilosophyDuty

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1991
Type
article
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
53-73
Citations
1006
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1006
OpenAlex

Cite This

Kenneth E. Goodpaster (1991). Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly , 1 (1) , 53-73. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857592

Identifiers

DOI
10.2307/3857592