Abstract
Abstract: This paper discusses the normative ethical theory of the business firm advanced principally by William E. Evan and R. Edward Freeman. According to their stakeholder theory, the firm should be managed for the benefit of its stakeholders: indeed, management has a fiduciary obligation to stakeholders to act as their agent. In this paper I seek to clarify the theory by discussing the concept of a stakeholder and by distinguishing stakeholder theory from two varieties of stockholder theory—I call them ‘pure’ and ‘tinged.’ I argue that the distinctive claims of stakeholder theory, as contrasted with tinged stockholder theories, have been inadequately supported by argument.
Keywords
Stakeholder theoryStakeholderFiduciaryNormativeShareholderObligationArgument (complex analysis)Business ethicsBusinessStakeholder managementTheory of the firmLaw and economicsPublic relationsSociologyManagementPolitical scienceEconomicsCorporate governanceLawIndustrial organization
Related Publications
The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications
?The stakeholder theory has been advanced and justified in the management literature on the basis of its descriptive accuracy, instrumental power, and normative validity. These ...
Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis
Much has been written about stakeholder analysis as a process by which to introduce ethical values into management decision-making. This paper takes a critical look at the assum...
A Stakeholder Apologetic for Management
Whom does management serve? No question is more central to business ethics than this. The classical theory of the firm assumes that management acts to maximize shareholder wealt...
Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts
Stakeholder theory has been a popular heuristic for describing the management environment for years, but it has not attained full theoretical status. Our aim in this article is ...
From CSR1 to CSR2
This 1978 paper outlines a conceptual transition in business and society scholarship, from the philosophical-ethical concept of corporate social responsibility (corporations' ob...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1994
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 431-443
- Citations
- 180
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
180
OpenAlex
Cite This
Bruce Langtry
(1994).
Stakeholders and the Moral Responsibilities of Business.
Business Ethics Quarterly
, 4
(4)
, 431-443.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3857342
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.2307/3857342