Abstract

Abstract Although mediational designs and analyses are quite popular in Organizational Behavior research, there is much confusion surrounding the basis of causal inferences. We review theoretical, research design, and construct validity issues that are important for drawing inferences from mediational analyses. We then distinguish between indirect effects, and partial and full mediational hypotheses and outline decision points for drawing inferences of each type. An empirical illustration is provided using structural equation modeling (SEM) techniques, and we discuss extensions and directions for future research. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords

PsychologyConstruct (python library)Structural equation modelingCausal inferenceSocial psychologyConfusionOrganizational behaviorCognitive psychologyInferenceCausal modelEmpirical researchEconometricsEpistemologyComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMathematicsStatisticsMachine learning

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2006
Type
article
Volume
27
Issue
8
Pages
1031-1056
Citations
929
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

929
OpenAlex

Cite This

John E. Mathieu, Scott R. Taylor (2006). Clarifying conditions and decision points for mediational type inferences in Organizational Behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior , 27 (8) , 1031-1056. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.406

Identifiers

DOI
10.1002/job.406