Abstract
Greater clarity regarding research review methods has the potential to enhance methodological rigor and subsequently the applicability of findings of all review methods to practice and policy.
Keywords
TerminologyNursing researchCLARITYSystematic reviewNursing literatureNursing practiceManagement scienceRigourPsychologyHealth careResearch designMEDLINEMedicineAlternative medicineNursingSociologyEpistemologyPolitical scienceSocial sciencePathologyEngineering
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
The integrative review: updated methodology
Aim. The aim of this paper is to distinguish the integrative review method from other review methods and to propose methodological strategies specific to the integrative review ...
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to efficacy and safety of health care interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and tr...
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarise evidence relating to efficacy and safety of healthcare interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and tra...
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to efficacy and safety of health care interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and tr...
Integrative reviews of nursing research
Abstract Integrative reviews of research are a valuable part of the process of creating and organizing a body of literature. It has been argued that integrative reviews should b...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2005
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 56???62-56???62
- Citations
- 321
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
321
OpenAlex
Cite This
Robin Whittemore
(2005).
Combining Evidence in Nursing Research.
Nursing Research
, 54
(1)
, 56???62-56???62.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-200501000-00008
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1097/00006199-200501000-00008