Abstract

Abstract Integrative reviews of research are a valuable part of the process of creating and organizing a body of literature. It has been argued that integrative reviews should be held to the same standards of clarity, rigor, and replication as primary research. In this paper methods for conducting an integrative review are discussed. Seventeen reviews from nursing journals were examined and compared with a proposed set of criteria for reviews. The results indicated that the majority of integrative reviews in nursing fell short of primary research standards. Guidelines for conducting more rigorous reviews are presented.

Keywords

CLARITYNursing researchNursing literatureSystematic reviewSet (abstract data type)PsychologyMEDLINENursingAlternative medicineMedicineComputer sciencePolitical science

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Combining Evidence in Nursing Research

Greater clarity regarding research review methods has the potential to enhance methodological rigor and subsequently the applicability of findings of all review methods to pract...

2005 Nursing Research 321 citations

Publication Info

Year
1987
Type
article
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
1-11
Citations
1281
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1281
OpenAlex

Cite This

Lawrence H.Ganong (1987). Integrative reviews of nursing research. Research in Nursing & Health , 10 (1) , 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770100103

Identifiers

DOI
10.1002/nur.4770100103