Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we examine comparative analysis of rates with a view to each of the usual comparative parameters‐rate difference (RD), rate ratio (RR) and odds ratio (OR)‐and with particular reference to first principles. For RD and RR we show the prevailing statistical practices to be rather poor. We stress the need for restricted estimation of variance in the chi‐square function underlying interval estimation (and also point estimation and hypothesis testing). For RR analysis we propose a chi‐square formulation analogous to that for RD and, thus, one which obviates the present practice of log transformation and its associated use of Taylor series approximation of the variance. As for OR analysis, we emphasize that the chi‐square function, introduced by Cornfield for unstratified data, and extended by Gart to the case of stratified analysis, is based on the efficient score and thus embodies its optimality properties. We provide simulation results to evince the better performance of the proposed (parameter‐constrained) procedures over the traditional ones.

Keywords

StatisticsPoint estimationVariance (accounting)Square (algebra)Confidence intervalMathematicsInterval estimationFunction (biology)Transformation (genetics)Series (stratigraphy)EstimationEconometricsTaylor seriesInterval (graph theory)Applied mathematicsPoint (geometry)Computer scienceCombinatorics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1985
Type
article
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
213-226
Citations
1063
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1063
OpenAlex
70
Influential
889
CrossRef

Cite This

Olli S. Miettinen, Markku Nurminen (1985). Comparative analysis of two rates. Statistics in Medicine , 4 (2) , 213-226. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780040211

Identifiers

DOI
10.1002/sim.4780040211
PMID
4023479

Data Quality

Data completeness: 77%