Abstract

The authors propose 2 categories of situational moderators of gender in negotiation: situational ambiguity and gender triggers. Reducing the degree of situational ambiguity constrains the influence of gender on negotiation. Gender triggers prompt divergent behavioral responses as a function of gender. Field and lab studies (1 and 2) demonstrated that decreased ambiguity in the economic structure of a negotiation (structural ambiguity) reduces gender effects on negotiation performance. Study 3 showed that representation role (negotiating for self or other) functions as a gender trigger by producing a greater effect on female than male negotiation performance. Study 4 showed that decreased structural ambiguity constrains gender effects of representation role, suggesting that situational ambiguity and gender triggers work in interaction to moderate gender effects on negotiation performance.

Keywords

AmbiguitySituational ethicsNegotiationPsychologySocial psychologyRepresentation (politics)Function (biology)Cognitive psychologySociologyComputer sciencePolitical science

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2005
Type
article
Volume
89
Issue
6
Pages
951-965
Citations
448
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

448
OpenAlex

Cite This

Hannah Riley Bowles, Linda Babcock, Kathleen L. McGinn (2005). Constraints and triggers: Situational mechanics of gender in negotiation.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 89 (6) , 951-965. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.951

Identifiers

DOI
10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.951