Abstract

Perhaps the fiercest conflict within the social sciences today is one that is not even articulated as a recognizable "debate." Nevertheless, this conflict has generated bitter divisions between academics who only a decade ago might have stood together on the left or the right and has forged equally strange alliances. I am referring, of course, to the split between epistemological and ontological positions which are usually described as radical constructivism and realist positivism. The recent debate provoked by Alan Sokal's article in Social TextSee Alan D. Sokal, "Transgressing the Boundaries—Toward a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity," Social Text (Spring-Summer 1996), 217–52; and idem, "A Physicist Experiments with Cultural Studies," Lingua Franca (May-June 1996), 62–64. The key response is Stanley Fish's article, "Professor Sokal's Bad Joke," in The New York Times (Opinion–Editorial page, May 21, 1996); see also the responses in the July-August 1996 issue of Lingua Franca; Michael Albert, "Science, Post Modernism, and the Left," in Z Magazine (July-August 1996); Steven Weinberg, "Sokal's Hoax," New York Review of Books (August 8, 1996), 11–15; and Tom Frank, "Textual Reckoning," In These Times (May 27, 1996). I am grateful to Michael Rosenfeld for references to the latter two pieces. brought into sharp focus the growing sense of distrust and anger that divides these academic camps. And, yet, the heterogeneity of each supposed grouping suggests that the dichotomous model masks what is actually a much more complex, multi-dimensional field. On the one hand we find a motley assemblage of positions variously characterized as constructivism, culturalism, neo-Kantian idealism, and postmodernism; the other pole throws together a set of even stranger bedfellows, including rational choice theorists, survey researchers, and traditional historians alongside "realist" philosophers of various stripes.

Keywords

SociologyPositivismEpistemologyPostmodernismCulturalismHistoricismPhilosophyPoliticsLawPolitical science

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Climate Change and Society

This article traces the long intellectual history that seeks to understand the recursive relationship between variations in the Earth's climate and variations in social structur...

1998 International Sociology 279 citations

Publication Info

Year
1998
Type
review
Volume
40
Issue
01
Citations
229
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

229
OpenAlex

Cite This

George Steinmetz (1998). Critical Realism and Historical Sociology. A Review Article. Comparative Studies in Society and History , 40 (01) . https://doi.org/10.1017/s0010417598980069

Identifiers

DOI
10.1017/s0010417598980069