Abstract

A previous study viewed brand equity as a price premium measured by the increment that a brandname contributes to the price of a product when controlling for its quality (as determined by an assessment of the relevant attributes, features, or characteristics). Using two samples of data drawn from Consumer Reports and the Crutchfield Catalog this earlier research found a striking absence of brand equity thus defined across a variety of product categories in the general area of consumer electronics. These findings raise the important question of whether this apparent absence of brand equity in the case of consumer electronics generalizes to other product classes. The present study uses the approach developed earlier to investigate this question in the context of five nondurable and durable categories: popcorn (N = 51), coffee (N = 82), recording tapes (N = 84), colas (N = 27), and automobiles (N = 96). Again, with minor exceptions, the results cast serious doubt on the viability of brand equity in the markets for consumer products.

Keywords

Brand equityProduct (mathematics)MarketingContext (archaeology)Equity (law)AdvertisingBusinessQuality (philosophy)EconomicsMathematics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Price and Choice Behavior

Do behavioral differences exist among consumers who select items priced differently within the same product category? Analysis of 18 perceptual, personality, and economic variab...

1972 Journal of Marketing Research 98 citations

Publication Info

Year
1995
Type
article
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
125-131
Citations
89
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

89
OpenAlex

Cite This

David C. Bello, Morris B. Holbrook (1995). Does an absence of brand equity generalize across product classes?. Journal of Business Research , 34 (2) , 125-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(95)00008-g

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/0148-2963(95)00008-g