Abstract
ABSTRACT This paper examines the power of statistical tests commonly used to evaluate the efficiency of speculative markets. It shows that these tests have very low power. Market valuations can differ substantially and persistently from the rational expectation of the present value of cash flows without leaving statistically discernible traces in the pattern of ex‐post returns. This observation implies that speculation is unlikely to ensure rational valuations, since similar problems of identification plague both financial economists and would be speculators.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Do Stock Prices Move Too Much to be Justified by Subsequent Changes in Dividends?
A simple model that is commonly used to interpret movements in corporate common stock. price indexes asserts that real stock prices equal the present value of rationally expecte...
The Cross‐Section of Realized Stock Returns: The Pre‐COMPUSTAT Evidence
ABSTRACT Using a database that is free of survivorship bias, this article finds that book‐to‐market equity, earnings yield, and cash flow yield have significant explanatory powe...
Fundamentals and Stock Returns in Japan
ABSTRACT This paper relates cross‐sectional differences in returns on Japanese stocks to the underlying behavior of four variables: earnings yield, size, book to market ratio, a...
Herd Behavior and Investment
This paper examines some of the forces that can lead to herd behavior in investment. Under certain circumstances, managers simply mimic the investment decisions of other manager...
Liquidity and the 1987 stock market crash
T he Crash of October 1987 was a puzzling event puzzling not only for what happened on October 19, but also for what subsequently did not happen. In spite of the magnitude and m...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1986
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 591-601
- Citations
- 1060
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb04519.x