Abstract

Cartographic approaches to burden estimation provide a globally consistent measure of malaria morbidity of known fidelity, and they represent the only plausible method in those malaria-endemic countries with nonfunctional national surveillance. Unacceptable uncertainty in the clinical burden of malaria in only four countries confounds our ability to evaluate needs and monitor progress toward international targets for malaria control at the global scale. National prevalence surveys in each nation would reduce this uncertainty profoundly. Opportunities for further reducing uncertainty in clinical burden estimates by hybridizing alternative burden estimation procedures are also evaluated.

Keywords

MalariaPlasmodium falciparumTransmission (telecommunications)Disease burdenIncidence (geometry)EpidemiologyEnvironmental healthPublic healthGlobal healthGeographyDemographyMedicinePopulationImmunologyPathologyComputer science

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017

The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2017 (GBD 2017) includes a comprehensive assessment of incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability (YL...

2018 The Lancet 13391 citations

Publication Info

Year
2010
Type
article
Volume
7
Issue
6
Pages
e1000290-e1000290
Citations
376
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

376
OpenAlex

Cite This

Simon I Hay, Emelda A. Okiro, Peter W. Gething et al. (2010). Estimating the Global Clinical Burden of Plasmodium falciparum Malaria in 2007. PLoS Medicine , 7 (6) , e1000290-e1000290. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000290

Identifiers

DOI
10.1371/journal.pmed.1000290