Experimental design and analysis and their reporting II: updated and simplified guidance for authors and peer reviewers

2018 British Journal of Pharmacology 1,317 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article updates the guidance published in 2015 for authors submitting papers to British Journal of Pharmacology (Curtis et al. , 2015) and is intended to provide the rubric for peer review. Thus, it is directed towards authors, reviewers and editors. Explanations for many of the requirements were outlined previously and are not restated here. The new guidelines are intended to replace those published previously. The guidelines have been simplified for ease of understanding by authors, to make it more straightforward for peer reviewers to check compliance and to facilitate the curation of the journal's efforts to improve standards.

Keywords

RubricComputer scienceData scienceInformation retrievalPsychologyMathematics education

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

A Tool for Reviewers

Peer review lies at the core of science and academic life. In one of its most pervasive forms, peer review for the scientific literature is the main mechanism that research jour...

2001 Academic Medicine 27 citations

Publication Info

Year
2018
Type
editorial
Volume
175
Issue
7
Pages
987-993
Citations
1317
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1317
OpenAlex

Cite This

Michael J. Curtis, S P H Alexander, Giuseppe Cirino et al. (2018). Experimental design and analysis and their reporting II: updated and simplified guidance for authors and peer reviewers. British Journal of Pharmacology , 175 (7) , 987-993. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.14153

Identifiers

DOI
10.1111/bph.14153