Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion.

1980 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 4,935 citations

Abstract

In Experiment 1, subjects read a persuasive message from a likable or unlikable communicator who presented six or two arguments concerning one of two topics. High response involvement subjects anticipated discussing the message topic at a future experimental session, whereas low involvement subjects anticipated discussing a different topic. For high involvement subjects, opinion change was significantly greater given six arguments but was unaffected by communicator likability. For low involvement subjects, opinion change was significantly greater given a likable communicator but was unaffected by the arguments manipulation. In Experiment 2, high issue involvement subjects showed slightly greater opinion change when exposed to five arguments from an unlikable (vs. one argument from a likable) communicator, whereas low involvement subjects exhibited significantly greater persuasion in response to one argument from a likable (vs. five arguments from an unlikable) communicator. These findings support the idea that high involvement leads message recipients to employ a systematic information processing strategy in which message-based cognitions mediate persuasion, whereas low involvement leads recipients to use a heuristic processing strategy in which simple decision rules mediate persuasion. Support was also obtained for the hypothesis that content-mediated (vs. source-mediated) opinion change would shower greater persistence.

Keywords

PersuasionPsychologyPersuasive communicationSocial psychologySource credibilityInformation processingHeuristicElaboration likelihood modelCognitive psychologyComputer scienceCredibility

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice Guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Gastroenterological Association

These recommendations are based on the following: (1) a formal review and analysis of the recently published world literature on the topic [Medline search up to June 2011]; (2) ...

2012 Hepatology 3765 citations

Publication Info

Year
1980
Type
article
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
752-766
Citations
4935
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

4935
OpenAlex
478
Influential
3283
CrossRef

Cite This

Shelly Chaiken (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 39 (5) , 752-766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752

Identifiers

DOI
10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752

Data Quality

Data completeness: 77%