The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect.
Fazio, Sanbonmatsu, Powell, and Kardes (1986) demonstrated that Ss were able to evaluate adjectives more quickly when these adjectives were immediately preceded (primed) by atti...
Publications
5 shownOccurrence versus moderation of the automatic attitude activation effect: Reply to Fazio.
In this reply to R. H. Fazio's (1993) commentary on the J. A. Bargh, S. Chaiken, R. Govender, and F. Pratto (1992) article, the main purposes and findings of that research are r...
The Automatic Evaluation Effect: Unconditional Automatic Attitude Activation with a Pronunciation Task
Previous demonstrations of automatic attitude activation have used the same critical test of the presence of automaticity (Bargh, Chaiken, Govender, & Pratto, 1992; Chaiken & Ba...
Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion.
In Experiment 1, subjects read a persuasive message from a likable or unlikable communicator who presented six or two arguments concerning one of two topics. High response invol...
Getting at the truth or getting along: Accuracy- versus impression-motivated heuristic and systematic processing.
Two studies examined the heuristic and systematic processing of accuracy- versus impression-motivated individuals expecting a discussion with a partner believed to hold either a...
Frequent Co-Authors
Researcher Info
- h-index
- 5
- Publications
- 5
- Citations
- 6,636
- Institution
- University Settlement
External Links
Impact Metrics
h-index
5
h-index: Number of publications with at least h citations each.