Abstract

Higher-order constructs, which facilitate modeling a construct on a more abstract higher-level dimension and its more concrete lower-order subdimensions, have become an increasingly visible trend in applications of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Unfortunately, researchers frequently confuse the specification, estimation, and validation of higher-order constructs, for example, when it comes to assessing their reliability and validity. Addressing this concern, this paper explains how to evaluate the results of higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM using the repeated indicators and the two-stage approaches, which feature prominently in applied social sciences research. Focusing on the reflective-reflective and reflective-formative types of higher-order constructs, we use the well-known corporate reputation model example to illustrate their specification, estimation, and validation. Thereby, we provide the guidance that scholars, marketing researchers, and practitioners need when using higher-order constructs in their studies.

Keywords

Structural equation modelingFormative assessmentConstruct (python library)Computer sciencePartial least squares regressionReputationOrder (exchange)Reliability (semiconductor)Dimension (graph theory)Feature (linguistics)Construct validityKnowledge managementPsychologyMachine learningMathematicsSociologyPsychometricsStatisticsBusinessMathematics education

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2019
Type
article
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
197-211
Citations
2475
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

2475
OpenAlex

Cite This

Marko Sarstedt, Joseph F. Hair, Jun‐Hwa Cheah et al. (2019). How to Specify, Estimate, and Validate Higher-Order Constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) , 27 (3) , 197-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.05.003

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.05.003