Abstract

This study analyzes the relationship among plant-level measures of industrial relations performance, economic performance, and quality-of-working-life programs. The analysis employs pooled time-series and cross-section data from 18 plants within a division of General Motors for the years 1970–79. The empirical results show strong associations between industrial relations and economic performance measures and limited support for the hypothesis that quality-of-working-life efforts improve both kinds of performance.

Keywords

Industrial relationsDivision of labourDivision (mathematics)Quality (philosophy)Operations managementClassical economicsEconomicsManagementMathematics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

High-Involvement Management.

Part One: The Promise of Participative Management 1. Changing Approaches to Management 2. Why Participative Approaches Meet Today's Needs 3. Participation and Organizational Eff...

1988 Administrative Science Quarterly 1141 citations

The Division of Labour in Society

Although the division of labour is not of recent origin, it was only at the end of the last century that societies began to become aware of this law, to which up to then they ha...

2023 1247 citations

Unions and Firm Profits

This study examines the effect of unionization on manufacturing firm profits, extending earlier research by combining industry‐level and firm‐level measures of unionization. Usi...

1992 Industrial Relations A Journal of Eco... 66 citations

Publication Info

Year
1983
Type
article
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
3-17
Citations
220
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

220
OpenAlex
5
Influential
111
CrossRef

Cite This

Harry C. Katz, Thomas A. Kochan, Kenneth R. Gobeille (1983). Industrial Relations Performance, Economic Performance, and QWL Programs: An Interplant Analysis. Industrial and Labor Relations Review , 37 (1) , 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979398303700101

Identifiers

DOI
10.1177/001979398303700101

Data Quality

Data completeness: 81%