Abstract

College students (25 men and 25 women) were randomly assigned (within sex) to each of the 4 factorial groups, based on manipulation of affect quality (positive vs. negative) and directional focus (internal vs. external) of mental imagery, and to a control group receiving no manipulation. Both imagery variables had a significant impact on pain tolerance and ratings during a cold-pressor test with positive affect and external imagery producing greater analgesia than their counterpart conditions. Positive affect imagery combined with external imagery resulted in the lowest reported pain amongst the groups. However, self-reported mood descriptors did not consistently parallel the pain tolerance and rating data. Likewise, although heart rate and skin potential responses increased during the cold pressor for the group as a whole, the only significant difference amongst the experimental groups was the relatively higher skin potential reactivity of the positive affect-external imagery group--possibly reflecting greater task engagement for this group. Seemingly, imagery in this situation operates primarily via cognitive, rather than via physiological mediators of the pain experience.

Keywords

Cold pressor testPsychologyAffect (linguistics)Pain toleranceMental imageMoodHeart rateCognitionClinical psychologyThreshold of painMedicineBlood pressureInternal medicinePsychiatryCommunication

MeSH Terms

AdultAnalgesiaAnalysis of VarianceCold TemperatureEmotionsFemaleHeart RateHumansImageryPsychotherapyMalePainSkin

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2001
Type
article
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
117-126
Citations
44
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

44
OpenAlex
3
Influential
29
CrossRef

Cite This

Andrew L. Alden, J. Alexander Dale, Douglas E. DeGood (2001). Interactive Effects of the Affect Quality and Directional Focus of Mental Imagery on Pain Analgesia. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback , 26 (2) , 117-126. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1011387122804

Identifiers

DOI
10.1023/a:1011387122804
PMID
11480162

Data Quality

Data completeness: 81%