Abstract
Evaluating the intercoder reliability (ICR) of a coding frame is frequently recommended as good practice in qualitative analysis. ICR is a somewhat controversial topic in the qualitative research community, with some arguing that it is an inappropriate or unnecessary step within the goals of qualitative analysis. Yet ICR assessment can yield numerous benefits for qualitative studies, which include improving the systematicity, communicability, and transparency of the coding process; promoting reflexivity and dialogue within research teams; and helping convince diverse audiences of the trustworthiness of the analysis. Few guidelines exist to help researchers negotiate the assessment of ICR in qualitative analysis. The current article explains what ICR is, reviews common arguments for and against its incorporation in qualitative analysis and offers guidance on the practical elements of performing an ICR assessment.
Keywords
Qualitative researchQualitative analysisCoding (social sciences)NegotiationTransparency (behavior)TrustworthinessReliability (semiconductor)Management sciencePsychologyEngineering ethicsComputer scienceSocial psychologySociologySocial scienceEngineering
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Reliability in Coding Open-Ended Data: Lessons Learned from HIV Behavioral Research
Analysis of text from open-ended interviews has become an important research tool in numerous fields, including business, education, and health research. Coding is an essential ...
The Content Analysis Guidebook
List of Boxes List of Tables and Figures Foreword Acknowledgments 1. Defining Content Analysis Is Content Analysis Easy? Is It Something That Anyone Can Do? A Six-Part Definitio...
What is Good Qualitative Research?
Qualitative research has an enormous amount to contribute to the fields of health, medicine and public health but readers and reviewers from these fields have little understandi...
InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing
List of Boxes, Figures, and Tables Preface to the Third Edition Acknowledgments About the Author Introduction 1. Introduction to Interview Research Conversation as Research Thre...
Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research
The rejection of reliability and validity in qualitative inquiry in the 1980s has resulted in an interesting shift for “ensuring rigor” from the investigator's actions during th...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2020
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 19
- Citations
- 2919
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
2919
OpenAlex
135
Influential
2213
CrossRef
Cite This
Cliódhna O’Connor,
Hélène Joffé
(2020).
Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines.
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
, 19
.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1177/1609406919899220