Investment and Wages in the Absence of Binding Contracts: A Nash Bargaining Approach

1984 Econometrica 948 citations

Abstract

The paper uses a generalized Nash bargain to analyze input levels, profits, and wages in the absence of binding contracts, and compares these with the convenitional binding contracts model. It is shown that if the union has any power, investment is lower in the absence of binding contracts. The associated input levels and shareholders' profits are identical to those that emerge if contracts are binding and the firm acts as if it faces a cost of capital which is a linear combination of the purchase price of capital and the resale value. This implicit cost is greater than the purchase price, is an increasing function of union power, and is independent of the profit function and the alternative wage. Increases in union power reduce shareholders' profits but may increase wages at some points and decrease wages at others. In the absence of binding contracts, shareholders' profits are lower but there is a critical level of union power (depending on the profit function) such that the union is worse off if its power is higher than this level and better off if it is lower.

Keywords

Bargaining problemEconomicsInvestment (military)MicroeconomicsLabour economicsMonetary economics

Related Publications

Unions and Firm Profits

This study examines the effect of unionization on manufacturing firm profits, extending earlier research by combining industry‐level and firm‐level measures of unionization. Usi...

1992 Industrial Relations A Journal of Eco... 66 citations

Publication Info

Year
1984
Type
article
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
449-449
Citations
948
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

948
OpenAlex

Cite This

Paul A. Grout (1984). Investment and Wages in the Absence of Binding Contracts: A Nash Bargaining Approach. Econometrica , 52 (2) , 449-449. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911498

Identifiers

DOI
10.2307/1911498