Abstract

Abstract The well‐known study by Skodak and Skeels (1949), in which one hundred infants who were born to unwed mothers of below‐average IQ and were adopted into superior foster homes and grew up to obtain Stanford‐Binet IQs averaging 20 points higher than the IQs of their biological mothers, has frequently been interpreted as a contradiction of the evidence for the high heritability of intelligence. It is here shown that this is a misinterpretation of the Skodak and Skeels results, based on failure to consider the prediction made from a simple polygenic model of parent‐offspring resemblance. The Skodak and Skeels data, when analyzed properly in terms of a quantitative‐genetic model, are found to be not all improbable or contradictory of a broad heritability for IQ in the range of .70 to .80. Also, the common fallacy of generalizing the results of Skodak and Skeels as an environmental explanation of the cause of the approximately 1 σ mean white‐Negro IQ difference is explicated from the standpoint of genetic theory.

Keywords

HeritabilityFallacyPsychologyContradictionDevelopmental psychologyEvolutionary biologyPhilosophyBiologyEpistemology

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1973
Type
article
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
30-35
Citations
47
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

47
OpenAlex

Cite This

Arthur R. Jensen (1973). Let's understand Skodak and Skeels, finally<sup>1</sup>. Educational Psychologist , 10 (1) , 30-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461527309529086

Identifiers

DOI
10.1080/00461527309529086