Keywords
ScopusScrutinyAmusementMeta-analysisMedicineMEDLINESkepticismPublicationPublication biasPsychologyFamily medicinePolitical scienceInternal medicinePhilosophyLawSocial psychology
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials
This is the first in a series of four articles The quality of controlled trials is of obvious relevance to systematic reviews. If the “raw material” is flawed then the conclus...
The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence
Publication bias is the tendency on the parts of investigators, reviewers, and editors to submit or accept manuscripts for publication based on the direction or strength of the ...
Ghost Authorship in Industry-Initiated Randomised Trials
Ghost authorship in industry-initiated trials is very common. Its prevalence could be considerably reduced, and transparency improved, if existing guidelines were followed, and ...
Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report.
Following a review of extant reporting standards for scientific publication, and reviewing 10 years of experience since publication of the first set of reporting standards by th...
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Assessment of risk of bias is regarded as an essential component of a systematic review on the effects of an intervention. The most commonly used tool for randomised trials is t...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1997
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 350
- Issue
- 9085
- Pages
- 1182-1182
- Citations
- 385
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
385
OpenAlex
Cite This
Ciarán P. Kelly
(1997).
Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
The Lancet
, 350
(9085)
, 1182-1182.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(05)63834-2
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)63834-2