Abstract
Most decision support systems (DSS) contain stored data, data analysis procedures, and decision models. However, many DSS have grown to the point that the average end user is presented with a bewildering array of information resources that are difficult to manage in an effective manner. As a result users often gravitate to a few familiar models and are unaware of the data resources available to them and how these resources relate to the various models. For example, they may think that a model requires data that is unavailable, when in fact that data has recently been added to the data base or could be calculated from another model. Or they may believe that all of the data needed to execute a set of models is available and find out well into the analysis that it is not. Existing tools for DSS design do not provide an effective and comprehensive foundation for modeling all the components of a DSS, or for addressing all the important DSS analysis and design issues. In this paper we show how a new graph-theoretic structure, called a metagraph, can be used as a unifying basis for addressing many important questions in DSS development and use.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
An Empirical Investigation of Information Search Strategies with Implications for Decision Support System Design
ABSTRACT Understanding how people search through and combine information before making decisions is an important concern in the study of decision making and in the design of dec...
Cognitive Style as a Basis for MIS and DSS Designs: Much ADO About Nothing?
It is commonly believed that the user's cognitive style should be considered in the design of Management Information Systems and Decision Support Systems. In contrast, an examin...
A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes
This paper addresses the design problem of providing IT support for emerging knowledge processes (EKPs). EKPs are organizational activity patterns that exhibit three characteris...
Research Commentary: Introducing a Third Dimension in Information Systems Design—The Case for Incentive Alignment
Prior research has generated considerable knowledge on information systems design from software engineering and user-acceptance perspectives. As organizational processes are inc...
The Effects of Group Attitudes Toward Alternative GDSS Designs on the Decision-making Performance of Computer-Supported Groups
Empirical investigations of the effects of group decision support systems (GDSS) accord relatively little attention to the role of attitudes developed by groups toward the GDSS....
Publication Info
- Year
- 1994
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1579-1600
- Citations
- 75
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.40.12.1579