Abstract

* The argument in this paper reduces to three basic points. Under regimes of monopoly (and monopolistic competition), product characteristics (which are often endogenous variables) are not usually optimally set under the pressure of market forces. Second, regulation is also beset with difficulties when price and quality are decision variables. These difficulties are informational, and are closely related to the sources of market failure in the unregulated market. Third, rate of return regula

Keywords

MonopolyEconomicsQuality (philosophy)MicroeconomicsNatural monopolyIndustrial organizationNeoclassical economicsPhysics

Related Publications

The Market Mechanism as an Incentive Scheme

It is often argued that competition in the product market reduces managerial slack. We formalize this idea. Suppose that there is a common component to firms' costs, i.e., as on...

1983 The Bell Journal of Economics 1505 citations

Endogenous Technological Change

Growth in this model is driven by technological change that arises from intentional investment decisions made by profit-maximizing agents. The distinguishing feature of the tech...

1990 Journal of Political Economy 15024 citations

Publication Info

Year
1975
Type
article
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
417-417
Citations
1086
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1086
OpenAlex

Cite This

A. Michael Spence (1975). Monopoly, Quality, and Regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics , 6 (2) , 417-417. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003237

Identifiers

DOI
10.2307/3003237