Abstract
We propose a model of motivated skepticism that helps explain when and why citizens are biased‐information processors. Two experimental studies explore how citizens evaluate arguments about affirmative action and gun control, finding strong evidence of a prior attitude effect such that attitudinally congruent arguments are evaluated as stronger than attitudinally incongruent arguments. When reading pro and con arguments, participants (Ps) counterargue the contrary arguments and uncritically accept supporting arguments, evidence of a disconfirmation bias. We also find a confirmation bias—the seeking out of confirmatory evidence—when Ps are free to self‐select the source of the arguments they read. Both the confirmation and disconfirmation biases lead to attitude polarization—the strengthening of t 2 over t 1 attitudes—especially among those with the strongest priors and highest levels of political sophistication. We conclude with a discussion of the normative implications of these findings for rational behavior in a democracy.
Keywords
SkepticismMotivated reasoningPsychologyNormativePoliticsSocial psychologySophisticationPositive economicsEpistemologyPolitical scienceSociologyEconomicsLawPhilosophySocial science
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Motivated Reasoning and Performance on the was on Selection Task
People tend to approach agreeable propositions with a bias toward confirmation and disagreeable propositions with a bias toward disconfirmation. Because the appropriate strategy...
Confirmation and Matching Biases in Hypothesis Testing
A number of investigators have claimed that subjects show confirmation bias on a variety of reasoning tasks. However, subjects who were classified as “confirming” had often sele...
Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises
Confirmation bias, as the term is typically used in the psychological literature, connotes the seeking or interpreting of evidence in ways that are partial to existing beliefs, ...
Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing.
Strategies for hypothesis testing in scientific investigation and everyday reasoning have interested both psychologists and philosophers.A number of these scholars stress the im...
AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF A MODEL OF RESISTANCE TO PERSUASION
This investigation synthesized research from several related areas to produce a model of resistance to persuasion based upon variables not considered by earlier congruity and in...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2006
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 755-769
- Citations
- 4077
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
4077
OpenAlex
Cite This
Charles S. Taber,
Milton Lodge
(2006).
Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.
American Journal of Political Science
, 50
(3)
, 755-769.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x