Abstract
Confirmation bias, as the term is typically used in the psychological literature, connotes the seeking or interpreting of evidence in ways that are partial to existing beliefs, expectations, or a hypothesis in hand. The author reviews evidence of such a bias in a variety of guises and gives examples of its operation in several practical contexts. Possible explanations are considered, and the question of its utility or disutility is discussed.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs
We propose a model of motivated skepticism that helps explain when and why citizens are biased‐information processors. Two experimental studies explore how citizens evaluate arg...
Confirmation and Matching Biases in Hypothesis Testing
A number of investigators have claimed that subjects show confirmation bias on a variety of reasoning tasks. However, subjects who were classified as “confirming” had often sele...
Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing.
Strategies for hypothesis testing in scientific investigation and everyday reasoning have interested both psychologists and philosophers.A number of these scholars stress the im...
Cognitive Optimism: Self-Deception or Memory-Based Processing Heuristics?
In a wide variety of cognitive tasks, people's expectations of what their own performance is, was, and will be are an overestimate of reality. After documenting a number of situ...
Media Bias and Reputation
A Bayesian consumer who is uncertain about the quality of an information source will infer that the source is of higher quality when its reports conform to the consumer's prior ...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1998
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 175-220
- Citations
- 6745
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175