Abstract

EDITOR—Wailoo et al highlight a fundamental challenge that the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) faces on a daily basis.1 The government established NICE not only to advise the NHS on the quality of care that individual patients could expect (in terms of appropriateness and effectiveness) but also to address the other important dimensions of healthcare quality (equity, fairness, and efficiency) that society expects. We agree that being required to address both …

Keywords

NiceExcellenceEquity (law)GuidelineQuality (philosophy)Government (linguistics)Health carePublic relationsMedicinePolitical scienceActuarial sciencePsychologyBusinessComputer scienceLaw

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

Background and Purpose— The purpose of these guidelines is to provide an up-to-date comprehensive set of recommendations in a single document for clinicians caring for adult pat...

2019 Stroke 6607 citations

Publication Info

Year
2004
Type
letter
Volume
329
Issue
7465
Pages
571.1-571.1
Citations
189
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

189
OpenAlex

Cite This

Peter Littlejohns, Gillian Leng, Tony Culyer et al. (2004). NICE clinical guidelines: Maybe health economists should participate in guideline development. BMJ , 329 (7465) , 571.1-571.1. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7465.571

Identifiers

DOI
10.1136/bmj.329.7465.571