Abstract

If competitive equilibrium is defined as a situation in which prices are such that all arbitrage profits are eliminated, it is not clear whether it is possible that a competitive economy will always be in equilibrium. Clearly not, for then those who arbitrage make no return from their costly activity. Hence the assumptions that all markets, including that for information, are always in equilibrium and always perfectly arbitraged are inconsistent when arbitrage is costly. A model has been proposed in which there is an equilibrium degree of disequilibrium: prices reflect the information of informed individuals but only partially, so that those who expend resources to obtain information do receive compensation. The model is the simplest one in which prices perform a well-articulated role in conveying information from the informed to the uninformed. When informed individuals observe information that the return to a security is going to be high, they bid its price up, and conversely when they observe information that the return is going to be low. Thus the price system makes publicly available the information obtained by informed individuals to the uniformed. The theory of "efficient capital markets" has also been discussed.

Keywords

ImpossibilityEconomicsMathematical economicsNeoclassical economicsMicroeconomicsPolitical scienceLaw

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1980
Type
article
Citations
3728
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

3728
OpenAlex

Cite This

Sanford J. Grossman, Joseph E. Stiglitz (1980). On the Impossibility of Informationally Efficient Markets. Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University) . https://doi.org/10.7916/d8765r99

Identifiers

DOI
10.7916/d8765r99