Abstract

In spite of the widespread acceptance by academics and practitioners of structured programming precepts, relatively few formal empirical studies have been conducted to obtain evidence that either supports or refutes the theory. This paper reviews the empirical studies that have been undertaken and critiques them from the viewpoints of the soundness of their methodology and their ability to contribute to scientific understanding. In general, the evidence supporting programming precepts is weak. A framework for an ongoing research program is outlined.

Keywords

ViewpointsComputer scienceSoundnessEmpiricismEmpirical researchManagement scienceProgramming languageEpistemologySoftware engineeringData sciencePhilosophy

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice Guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Gastroenterological Association

These recommendations are based on the following: (1) a formal review and analysis of the recently published world literature on the topic [Medline search up to June 2011]; (2) ...

2012 Hepatology 3765 citations

Column Editor

Will health librarians and related information workers ever work together to create an international network, such as the Cochrane Collaboration, dedicated to the purpose of pre...

2001 Health Information & Libraries Journal 15 citations

Publication Info

Year
1984
Type
article
Volume
SE-10
Issue
4
Pages
397-407
Citations
64
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

64
OpenAlex

Cite This

Iris Vessey, Ron Weber (1984). Research on Structured Programming: An Empiricist's Evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , SE-10 (4) , 397-407. https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.1984.5010252

Identifiers

DOI
10.1109/tse.1984.5010252