Abstract

This article reviews the status of similarity as an explanatory construct with a focus on similarity judgments. For similarity to be a useful construct, one must be able to specify the ways or respects in which two things are similar. One solution to this problem is to restrict the notion of similarity to hard-wired perceptual processes. It is argued that this view is too narrow and limiting. Instead, it is proposed that an important source of constraints derives from the similarity comparison process itself. Both new experiments and other evidence are described that support the idea that respects are determined by processes internal to comparisons

Keywords

Similarity (geometry)PsychologyCognitive psychologyArtificial intelligenceComputer science

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Features of similarity.

The metric and dimensional assumptions that underlie the geometric representation of similarity are questioned on both theoretical and empirical grounds. A new set-theoretical a...

1977 Psychological Review 7176 citations

Self-efficacy and classroom learning

This article discusses the role of perceived self-efficacy during classroom learning of cognitive skills. Self-efficacy refers to personal judgments of performance capabilities ...

1985 Psychology in the Schools 462 citations

Publication Info

Year
1993
Type
article
Volume
100
Issue
2
Pages
254-278
Citations
1127
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric
PlumX Metrics

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1127
OpenAlex

Cite This

Douglas L. Medin, Robert L. Goldstone, Dedre Gentner (1993). Respects for similarity.. Psychological Review , 100 (2) , 254-278. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.100.2.254

Identifiers

DOI
10.1037/0033-295x.100.2.254